 |
|
| 破解偶像 -- 從《維摩詰所說經通論》談佛教經典的詮釋方法=Destroy idols: Talk about annotation of Buddhism Sutra from the review of Vimalakirti-Nivdesa Sutra | ||
| 作者 | 孫勁松 (著)=Sung, Jin-song (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 成大宗教與文化學報=Journal of Religion and Culture of National Cheng Kung University |
| 卷期 | n.2 |
| 出版日期 | 2002.12 |
| 頁次 | 79 - 99 |
| 出版者 | 國立成功大學中國文學系宗教與文化研究室 |
| 出版者網址 | http://zhncku.med.ncku.edu.tw/buddhism/list.php |
| 出版地 | 臺南市, 臺灣 [Tainan shih, Taiwan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 中文=Chinese |
| 關鍵詞 | 程俱=Chen Ju; 維摩詰所說經通論=the comment of Vimalakirti-Nivdesa Sutra; 理事互融=explaining Myth by Principle; 偶像=idols |
| 摘要 | 佛教經典基本上是“理事互融”的結構，就“事相”而言，對佛教經典的詮釋有以事解事、以理解事兩種基本的詮釋方法，以法釋相是以理解事的特殊形式。程俱爲南宋士大夫，著有《維摩詰所說經通論》，《通論》受莊學等中國本土文化的影響，在禪宗詮釋方法的基礎上，將“以法釋相、以理解事”用到極處，指出佛教中的佛、菩薩形象都是象徵性的，並非外在的偶像，這種詮釋是儒釋道得以交融的關鍵原因。 Buddhism Sutra’s structure is basically “fusing Principle and Myth together”. According to “Myth -Idol”, there are two elemental kinds of annotation of Buddhism Sutra, one is explaining Myth by Myth, and the other is explaining Myth by Principle. Explaining Myth by Avenue is a special form of explaining Myth by Principle . Chen Ju, a scholar-bureaucrat in Nan Song Dynasty, wrote the comment of Vimalakirti-Nivdesa Sutra. Influenced by indigenous cultures such as Zhuangzi, the reeview was based on annotation of Zen and developed “Explaining Idol by Avenue ” and “explaining Myth by Principle ” to the extreme. Chen Ju argued that the figures of Buddha and Bodhisattva were symbolistic idols rather than objective ones. The kind of annotation was why Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism could fuse into one. |
| 目次 | 一、程俱的詮釋方法概述 81 二、《維摩詰所說經》的行文結構與教下僧侶的詮釋方法 86 三、《易》《莊》與禪宗破相化的詮釋 87 四、程俱破相詮釋法略評 88 附：《維摩詰所說經》通論八篇 90 |
| ISSN | 18136400 (P); 18136400 (E) |
| 點閱次數 | 1997 |
| 建檔日期 | 2005.11.25 |
| 更新日期 | 2017.08.16 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
