 |
|
| A Korean Yogācāra Monk in China: Won-Cheuk (612--696) and His Commentary on the Heart Sūtra | ||
| 作者 | Hwang, Chang-geun (著) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | Dissertation Abstracts International |
| 卷期 | v.61 n.12 Section A |
| 出版日期 | 2000 |
| 出版者 | ProQuest LLC |
| 出版者網址 | https://www.proquest.com/ |
| 出版地 | Ann Arbor, MI, US [安娜堡, 密西根州, 美國] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 學位類別 | 博士 |
| 校院名稱 | University of Wisconsin - Madison |
| 系所名稱 | Religion |
| 指導教授 | Rafferty, Ellen |
| 畢業年度 | 2000 |
| 附註項 | 485p |
| 關鍵詞 | Korean; Yogacara; Monk; China; Won-Cheuk; Heart Sutra |
| 摘要 | During the seventh to eighth centuries, China was the site of confluence and lively debate between two major streams within Yogācāra studies which solidified into two main sects—the Tz'u-en and the Hsi-ming, which were led by two scholars, K'uei-chi (632–682) and Won-cheuk, respectively. K'uei-chi, who was Hsüan-tsang's successor, enjoyed the reputation of being one of the most authoritative Yogācāra, scholars in Chinese Buddhist history, and was acknowledged as the founder of the Chinese Yogācāra School or the Fa-hsiang School. On the other hand, Won-cheuk was marginal as a Korean monk, and suffered the reputation of being the doctrinal divergent of the mainstream Fa-hsiang School. The debate between K'uei-chi and Won-cheuk forms one of the central focus of this thesis. Involved in this debate is not only personal reputation but distinct doctrinal differences as well. An examination of Won-cheuk's biography and his works presents an alternative than that found in previous scholarship. The evidence reveals an erudite scholar who was Hsüan-tsang's peer, and who likely received from Hsüan-tsang the original Sanskrit commentaries on Vasubandhu's Trimśikā-vijñiapti-kārikā . Won-cheuk's own systematic, analytical and carefully cited works were based upon his knowledge of these Sanskrit texts, resulting in a unique doctrinal perspective which contrasted with Chinese scholars whose terminology and conceptions were heavily influenced by Confucianism. For example, Won-cheuk's perspective of the Buddha's turning of the Dharma-wheel was not to be viewed in terms of a hierarchical or temporal classification, but rather, the first two turnings should be viewed as “skill-in-means.” Won-cheuk defined a “middle path” of scholarship, navigating between the old and the new Yogācāra studies. Through this selective process, Won-cheuk could evaluate old and new Yogācāra canons, some of which he conserved, some of which he discarded. He analyzed doctrinal differences, yet the overall effect was a welding of what appeared to be incompatible perspectives. In this way, he created his harmonious and syncretic Buddhist thought. |
| ISBN | 0493047255; 9780493047256 |
| 點閱次數 | 706 |
| 建檔日期 | 2005.09.23 |
| 更新日期 | 2022.03.25 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
