![]() |
|
| 李爾王的佛理閱讀=A Buddhist Reading of King Lear | ||
| 作者 | 張紹國 |
|---|---|
| 出版日期 | 2000 |
| 出版者 | 國立臺灣大學外國語文學研究所 |
| 出版地 | 臺灣 [Taiwan] |
| 資料類型 | 博碩士論文=Thesis and Dissertation |
| 使用語言 | 中文=Chinese |
| 學位類別 | 碩士 |
| 校院名稱 | 國立臺灣大學 |
| 系所名稱 | 外國語文學系研究所 |
| 指導教授 | 彭鏡禧 |
| 畢業年度 | 88 |
| 關鍵詞 | 李爾王; 佛教倫理學=Buddhist Ethics |
| 摘要 | 本論文以佛家的角度來閱讀《李爾王》,以提供一些從佛家的觀點才能顯現的新看法。本論文的立場是認為所有的文學詮釋無可避免地皆是根據閱讀者對文本的體驗,並且是以某一種或某一些理論為依據,無論是馬克斯理論、經神分析、新批評、女性主義、新歷史觀、基督教的觀點,或是佛理。然而,本論文拒絕把《李爾王》限制在單一或是簡化的詮釋,而是要使此劇本不受限制地得到新的闡明。佛法特別能勝任此項任務的,因為佛法中的不二法門能夠解構此劇本的結尾,而非提供一個死的結論。而此種法門本身也存在於某些莎士比亞的劇本,因為有些劇本不斷地自我解構,而非提供一個固定的解答。 論文中所探討的題目,包括了:存在的本質、人天的關係、親子關係、情慾、無常、空、苦、因果、自我、無明、愚癡、智慧、慈悲、體悟與解脫。我們比較佛教對這些主題的看法與劇本中對這些主題的表達。常常劇本中所表達的概念與佛教的觀點雷同。有時候卻是很相似,但是不完全一樣。無論如何,我們的比較都是以劇本中的文字作為證據。偶而,我們的佛教觀點在劇本中找不到證據。此時,這些佛理的詮釋是為了讓讀者作為參考。 The present thesis offers a reading of King Lear from a Buddhist perspective to shed new light on some aspects of the play, some of which are perceivable only from a Buddhist point of view. The premise here is that all literary interpretations are unavoidably personal, and are inevitably based on a certain theoretical basis or a combination of theoretical bases, be it Marxist, Psychoanalytic, New Critical, Feminist, New Historical, Christian-or Buddhist. However, the thesis resists the temptation to restrict the text to one particular, simplified reading, and is aimed to open up the text to new illuminations, a task which is especially suitable for a Buddhist reading of the play, as the Method of Non-duality in Buddhism deconstructs, rather than offers a conclusion to the ending of the play, a method which is also existent in various Shakespearean plays which perpetually deconstruct themselves instead of yielding a resolution. Topics in the thesis include the nature of human existence, the gods, the parent-child relationship, sexuality, impermanence, nothingness, suffering, cause and effect, the ego, ignorance, folly, wisdom, compassion, enlightenment, and liberation. These themes are examined by comparing the views expressed in the play with relevant Buddhist views. Often, the concepts expressed in the play are identical to the Buddhist ones. At other times, they are similar, but not exactly the same. These comparisons are, nevertheless, all based on textual evidences found in King Lear. In a few cases where a Buddhist interpretation may not be substantiated by textual evidence from the play, the Buddhist perspective is anyhow offered solely for the reader's reference. |
| 目次 | Table of Contents PREFACE IV INTRODUCTION 1 1. The Eight Types of Suffering in King Lear 5 2. "Nothing can be made out of nothing" 38 3. Cordelia and the Bodhisattva Ideal 57 4. Conclusion: "Is this the promis'd end?" 77 WORKS CITED 91 |
| 點閱次數 | 343 |
| 建檔日期 | 2005.09.23 |
| 更新日期 | 2015.10.16 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
