 |
|
| 郁達夫與傳統理欲觀=Yu Dafu versus the Traditional Views on Ethics and Sexual Passion | ||
| 作者 | 黃裔 |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 福建師範大學學報 (哲學社會科學版)=Journal of Fujian Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) |
| 卷期 | n.1 |
| 出版日期 | 2002 |
| 頁次 | 57 - 61 |
| 出版者 | 福建師範大學學報編輯部 |
| 出版者網址 | http://xuebao.fjnu.edu.cn/newzx/ |
| 出版地 | 福州, 中國 [Fuzhou, China] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 中文=Chinese |
| 附註項 | 出處:中國期刊網－文史哲輯專欄目錄 |
| 關鍵詞 | 鬱達夫; 背叛; 傳統理欲觀 |
| 摘要 | 郁達夫是中國現代最早涉及性意識的小說家 ,但對此貢獻毀譽不一。要科學地評價他 ,就得弄清他如何背叛傳統理欲觀。傳統理欲觀不外乎以理節欲、存理滅欲、去理縱欲三類。華夏古國 ,儒、道、佛三教擰成思想絞索 ,絞殺人性。馬、恩和魯迅否定禁欲主義。郁達夫持類似觀點 ,其文論與小說 ,主張表現性愛 ,向傳統理欲觀提出挑戰 ,具有一定社會意義。某些作品性愛描寫失于直露 ,但無損其歷史地位 In modern China, Yu Dafu was the first novelist to be related to sexual consciousness. However, controversy exists concerning the valuation of his contribution. For a scientific valuation of Yu, a sound understanding is essential of how he betrays the traditional views on ethics and sexual passion. The traditional views on ethics and sexual passion are classified into categories: controlling sexual passion with ethics, maintaining ethics by eliminating sexual passion, and indulging in sexual passion by abandoning ethics. The first two categories are predominant, which repress the human nature of the Chinese people. Marx, Engels, and Lu Xun oppose asceticism. Yu Dafu, in his novels and critical essays on literature, advocates the expression of sexual love. He challenges the traditional views on ethics and sexual passion, which is socially meaningful to some extent. Though some of Yus works are overly explicit in sexual description, this feature does not weaken his historical position. |
| ISSN | 10005285 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 131 |
| 建檔日期 | 2005.04.15 |
| 更新日期 | 2020.05.15 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
