 |
|
| 明代復古與創新的理論根源=On the Theoretical Origins of Restoring Ancient Ways and Innovation in Ming Dynasty | ||
| 作者 | 鄧程 |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 遼寧師範大學學報 (社會科學版)=Journal of Liaoning Normal University (Social Science Edition) |
| 卷期 | n.4 |
| 出版日期 | 2003 |
| 頁次 | 66 - 70 |
| 出版者 | 遼寧師範大學 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.lnnu.edu.cn/ |
| 出版地 | 大連, 中國 [Talien, China] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 中文=Chinese |
| 附註項 | 出處：中國期刊網－文史哲輯專欄目錄 作者單位：北京大學文學博士，中國廣播電視出版社，主要從事中國語言文學研究 |
| 關鍵詞 | 復古=restoring ancient ways; 創新=innovation; 禪悟="Wu" (enlightenment); 法=law |
| 摘要 | 嚴羽雖然提倡復古，實際又開了後世創新理論的方便之門。明以後詩論有兩大派：以禪宗「悟」為中心概念一派，以李夢陽「法」為中心概念的一派，前者主創新，對語言不信任的程度遠過於道家對語言的不信任，後者則強調復古。但這兩派均沒有抓住意象這一中心問題，這是兩派均告失敗的根源。 Although Yan Yu advocated restoring ancient ways, he actually Opened the door of establishing of innovation theories for the younger gererations. After Ming Dynasty, poetry criticism was divided into two schools: the concept school of dhyana with "WU" ( enlightened) as core meaning; the other school of Li Meng-yang with the law as core meaning. The former maintained innovation, with far more disbelief in language than the Dao Family. The latter, on the contrary, stressed on restoring ancient ways. However, neither of them could see the core issue of image, resulting in their failure. |
| ISSN | 10001751 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 192 |
| 建檔日期 | 2005.04.08 |
| 更新日期 | 2020.05.22 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
