|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
道綽の一行三昧について：道信との比較を通じて浮かぶ諸点=Ekavyūhasamadhi Quoted by Daochuo 道綽: A Comparison with Daoxin 道信 |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
里見奎周 (著)
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.71 n.2 (總號=n.159) |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2023.03.22 |
|---|
| ページ | 497 - 501 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://www.jaibs.jp/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 日文=Japanese |
|---|
| キーワード | 道綽; 『安楽集』; 『文殊般若経』; 一行三昧; 道信 |
|---|
| 抄録 | Daochuo 道綽, a monk of Pure Land affiliations in the Sui~Tang era, in his Anle ji 安楽集, referred to the ekavyūhasamādhi 一行三昧 from the Saptaśatikā Prajnāpāramitā as supporting evidence for his discussion of the Buddha mindfulness samādhi 念仏三昧 of the Guan Wuliangshou jing. He interpreted the ekavyūhasamādhi as one of the practices for birth in the Pure Land.
In contrast, in the same period Daoxin 道信, known as 4th preceptor of the Chan lineage, aimed to understand the dharmadhātu 法界 by practicing the ekavyūhasamādhi as a Chan technique. Between Daochuo and Daoxin there is thus a difference of interpretation of ekavyūhasamādhi.
Finally, to organize the descriptions of Daochuo and Daoxin, there is a possibility that Pure Land and Chan monks disputed with each other in the early 7th century. |
|---|
| 目次 | 一 序言 497
二 『文殊般若経』所説の『一行三昧』の整理 497
三 道信と道綽の一行三昧解釈について 498
四 道信の浄土教批判と道綽について 499
五 おわりに 500
〈参考文献〉 501 |
|---|
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.71.2_497 |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 49 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2024.10.18 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2024.10.23 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
