 |
|
| Mindsets and Commentarial Conventions Among Indian Buddhists | ||
| 著者 | Nance, Richard F. (著) |
|---|---|
| 掲載誌 | Journal of the American Academy of Religion |
| 巻号 | v.83 n.1 |
| 出版年月日 | 2015.03 |
| ページ | 210 - 235 |
| 出版者 | Oxford University Press |
| 出版サイト | http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/ |
| 出版地 | Oxford, UK [牛津, 英國] |
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 言語 | 英文=English |
| 抄録 | This article is in five sections. After a brief introduction, I examine Johannes Bronkhorst's hypothesis that postulation of a commentarial "mindset" may help to account for the persistence of errors that occur in medieval Indian root texts and in commentaries on those texts. Although aspects of Bronkhorst's account are tenable, I argue that its overall conclusion is unhelpful and should be reassessed in light of the data provided in Buddhist commentaries and commentarial guides. In the article's third and fourth sections, I explore two instances of commentary that call into question the explanatory power of the commentarial mindset as sketched by Bronkhorst. The fifth section of the article suggests some previously overlooked resources for recovery of the conventions that governed the composition of commentaries among Indian Buddhists. |
| 目次 | Abstract 210 Setting The Stage Two Further Passages Drawn from Buddhist Commentaries 219 The Aksayamatinirdesasutratikā 219 The Vimalaprabhā 223 Addressing The Implications of These Passages 226 Exemplifying Commentary: The Vyākhyāyukti 227 References 233 |
| ISSN | 00027189 (P); 14774585 (E) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfu109 |
| ヒット数 | 85 |
| 作成日 | 2023.08.10 |
| 更新日期 | 2023.08.10 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
