 |
|
| Mind: A Sociological Versus a Buddhist Perspective | ||
| 著者 | Mahanarongchai, Sumalee (著) |
|---|---|
| 掲載誌 | Journal of the International Buddhist Studies College |
| 巻号 | v.1 n.1 |
| 出版年月日 | 2015 |
| ページ | 32 - 44 |
| 出版者 | Maha Chulalongkorn Rajavidyalaya University |
| 出版地 | Bangkok, Thailand [曼谷, 泰國] |
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 言語 | 英文=English |
| キーワード | Buddhism; mind; sign-process; sociology; Abhidhamma |
| 抄録 | In the course of time a topic broadly studied and discussed is “mind.” In this article two perspectives in relation to mind are explored; Peirce’s semiotic analysis applied in sociology and the higher doctrine (Pāli: Abhidhamma) in Theravāda Buddhism. Based on Peirce’s semiosis, some sociologists like Eugene Halton remark that mind is made out of meanings derived through sign-activities. It is that which matters meanings into being, thus intrinsically social. Viewing mindin general as sign-process or in particular as an indexical sign and a symbolic sign may be acceptable by Buddhists. But insisting that mind is intrinsically social is defi nitely controversial. According to the higher doctrine, each mind is like a point-instant at which three components are interlocking in contact and various mental activities are articulated as a fl ow of consciousness. In the conventional sense mind points tosign-process, but in the ontological (or the ultimate) sense it is a basis upon which mind-process makes possible sign-process. Supported by the teaching of Kamma in which choice and self-responsibility are of great signifi cance, mind will be the topic pertaining to individual deliberation rather than social determination. |
| 目次 | Abstract Reference |
| ISSN | 24655546 (P) |
| ヒット数 | 7 |
| 作成日 | 2022.11.28 |
| 更新日期 | 2022.11.28 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
