 |
|
| 全知者論証式と根本論証式=The Proof Statement of Omniscience and maulaḥ prayogaḥ | ||
| 著者 | 佐藤智岳 (著)=Sato, Chigaku (au.) |
|---|---|
| 掲載誌 | 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū |
| 巻号 | v.69 n.1 (總號=n.152) |
| 出版年月日 | 2020.12.25 |
| ページ | 373 - 368 |
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
| 出版サイト | http://www.jaibs.jp/ |
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 言語 | 日文=Japanese |
| キーワード | sarvajña; 一切法; シャーンタラクシタ; カマラシーラ |
| 抄録 | Regarding the introduction of Tattvasaṃgraha (TS) 3440–3441, the Tattvasaṃgrahapañjikā (TSP) mentions that the reason for denying omniscience suggested by Kumārila of “being a real thing etc.” could actually prove omniscience. However, in the TS 3440–3441 proof statement, we do not find the phrase “being a real thing etc.” that is found in TSP’s introduction. In its annotation for the relevant portion, TSP presents a proof statement with the expression maulaḥ prayogaḥ. This proof statement demonstrates omniscience by using the phrase “being a real thing etc.” The expression maulaḥ prayogaḥ is based on TS 3446. As can be seen from the fact that it is proving omniscience with the reason that Kumārila used for denying omniscience, its opposition to him is clear. TSP sees the proof statement from TS 3440–3441 as the ground for maulaḥ prayogaḥ. This proof statement is based on Pramāṇavārttika (PV) 2.136, PV 3.285, and the ideas of Dharmakīrti’s followers regarding these passages. A similar proof statement is found in the Madhyamakāloka. |
| 目次 | 1．問題の所在 373 2．根本論証式 372 3．TS における「実在であることなど」と全知者論証 370 4．〈全知者論証式〉の背景 370 5．〈全知者論証式〉のその後 370 6．おわりに 369 |
| ISSN | 00194344 (P) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.69.1_373 |
| ヒット数 | 216 |
| 作成日 | 2022.10.06 |
| 更新日期 | 2022.10.06 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
