 |
|
| 淨土詮釋傳統中的宗門意識 -- 論宋天台義學者對元照《觀無量壽經義疏》之批判及其所造成之反響=Sectarianism in the Pure Land Hermeneutic Tradition：On T'ien-t'ai Exegetes' Ctrique of Yuan-chao's Commentary on the Contemplation Sutra and the Repercussions of t | ||
| 著者 | 黃啟江 (著)=Huang, Chi-chiang (au.) |
|---|---|
| 掲載誌 | 中華佛學學報=Chung-Hwa Buddhist Journal=Journal of Chinese Buddhist Studies |
| 巻号 | n.14 |
| 出版年月日 | 2001.09 |
| ページ | 309 - 352 |
| 出版者 | 中華佛學研究所=Chung-Hwa Institute of Buddhist Studies |
| 出版サイト | http://www.chibs.edu.tw/publication_tw.php?id=12 |
| 出版地 | 新北市, 臺灣 [New Taipei City, Taiwan] |
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 言語 | 中文=Chinese; 英文=English |
| ノート | 全文：http://www.chibs.edu.tw/chibs/journal/JR-BJ001/14/309-350. htm |
| キーワード | 黃啟江; Huang, Chi-chiang; 《觀經》; 《新疏》; 《扶新論》; 《輔正解》; 道因; 戒度; 元照; 宗門意識; Contemplation Sutra; Hsin-shu; Kuan-ching Fu-hsin Lun; Fu-cheng-chieh; Tao-yin; Chieh-tu; Yuan-chao; Sectarianism |
| 抄録 | 本文所討論的主題 -- 宋代天台義學者在詮釋《觀無量壽經》時所表現的「宗門意識」 (sectarianism) -- 代表淨土詮釋傳統裏一個很值得注意的現象. 這現象之出現，可追溯到靈芝元照對《觀無量壽經》所做之新詮釋. 由於元照之觀經疏有擇取諸家舊疏之長，而被視為有尊善導疏而抑智顗疏之傾向，遂受到宋天台義學僧草菴道因之批判. 本文詳析道因對元照義疏所做的各項指控，及天台學者自吳克己至志磐等一脈相承的宗門意識. 由於道因對元照義疏之批判以《輔正解》一書之面貌出現，而其原書今已不存，只見於拙菴戒度《觀經扶新論》之引文中，本文亦根據戒度所錄之文，評估其書內容，說明它對元照義疏批判之強烈宗門意識. 拙菴戒度為聲援元照義疏而著《觀經扶新論》，反駁《輔正解》對元照義疏之指控，切中道因議論之弊. 他指出道因「建立門庭」而作《輔正解》，故意扭曲元照新疏之看法，強行批判，故其說理不勝辭，破綻隨處可見. 道因強烈之宗門意識所驅使，致使其在《輔正解》之議論充滿偏見，而吳克己，宗鑑，志磐等人卻附和其說，可見道因宗門意識對天台山家派義學影響之深. The topic of this paper -- sectarianism as expressed in Sung T'ien-t'ai scholars' exegeses of the Contemplation Sutra -- represents a noteworthy phenomenon in the Pure Land hermeneutic tradition. The phenomenon owes its occurrence to Ling-chih Yuan-chao's exegesis of the Contemplation Sutra. As Yuan-chao's commentary electively synthesizes the fine points of previous exegeses, it was perceived by Ch'ao-an Tao-yin，a Sung T'ien-t'ai exegete，as honoring Shan-tao's commentary at the expense of that of Chih-i. This paper details Tao-yin's accusation of some hermeneutic points found in Yuan-chao's commentary and relates the persistent sectarianism that characterizes the works compiled by T'ien-t'ai historians from Wu K'e-chi to Chih-p'an. Tao-yin's critique of Yuan-chao's commentary appears as a text called Fu-cheng-chieh, which is no longer extant but survives, in fragments, as interspersed quotes in the Kuan-ching fu-hsin lun by Chuo-an Chieh-tu. Based on this remainder of the Fu-cheng-chieh, this paper also assesses the text，discusses its contents, and reveals the sectarianism that underpins its criticism of Yuan-chao's hermeneutics. Chuo-an Chieh-tu wrote the Kuan-ching fu-hsin lun to uphold Yuan-chao's commentary. In his work，he refutes Tao-yin's accusation of Yuan-chao's commentary，pointedly listing the flaws of the Fu-cheng-chieh and showing Tao-yin's sectarian sentiment. In his view，Tao-yin，purporting to "build up [T'ien-t'ai's] gate and yard," wrote the Fu-cheng-chieh in which he deliberately distorted Yuan-chao's viewpoints and engaged in an acrimonious attack on Yuan-chao's commentary. As a result，it is full of errors and flaws. Driven by unyielding sectarianism，Tao-yin infuses in his discourse with much bias, which was to inspire such T'ien-t'ai scholars as Wu K'e-chi，Tsung-chien，and Chih-p'an. It shows clearly that his sectarianism had a large impact on T'ien-t'ai's Pure Land exegesis. |
| 目次 | 一. 序言 二. 元照《觀經新疏》之製作與反響 三. 草菴道因與《輔正解》 四.《輔正解》之「疑目」與元照《新疏》之原文 五.《輔正解》之「難詞」對元照《新疏》之批判 六.《扶新論》vs.《輔正解》 七. 結語 |
| ISSN | 10177132 (P) |
| ヒット数 | 3127 |
| 作成日 | 2001.10.19 |
| 更新日期 | 2017.06.20 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
